The two-person case is representative of multi-person dilemmas. This involves an experiential inspection of the various consequences—an approach that, in essence, grounds morality in our factual observations. Third, in many if not most cases, the utilitarian formula is neither a quick nor an easy way of making moral decisions.
However, in its overseas operations, the company often faces substandard regulatory frameworks and weak enforcement mechanisms, which present the opportunity of obtaining benefits through practices that would be unacceptable at home.
Our actual moral decision-making process depends on a patchwork of various theories and explanations that cannot be reduced to a single theme.
If the overall aim is to maximize the well-being of all people in all cities, for example, then we are likely to get better results by having individuals who know and understand particular cities focus on them while other people focus on other cities.
So both supporters and opponents of moral dilemmas can give an account of why agents who face moral conflicts appropriately experience negative moral emotions. They argue that it is a mistake to treat whole classes of actions as right or wrong because the effects of actions differ when they are done in different contexts and morality must focus on the likely effects of individual actions.
The former are situations in which more than one feasible action is obligatory. The SDGs are likely to become an important source of guidelines for the behavior of multinational corporations in years to come [ 30 ].