Establishing a teen court program essay

Youth tribunal model

Third, because of the wide variation among current studies, especially with regard to how recidivism was measured e. Of the 15 studies that assessed statistical significance of recidivism, 4 found statistically significant results favoring Teen Courts, 1 found statistically significant results favoring processing in the traditional juvenile justice system, and 10 found null results. Six studies conducted only descriptive analyses for at least 1 of their primary outcomes. Discussion Despite the popularity of Teen Courts as a juvenile justice diversion model, evidence of their effectiveness is unclear. They do not have to admit guilt. Additional studies that consider short term indicators and explore pathways are needed in order to support causal inference and the development of evidence-based practices. For example, data in 2 counties examined by Bright et al. Volunteer students from grades seven through twelve from local county schools are selected to serve on Teen Courts.

Casey Foundation The article should have specified that, although the county runs four courts, there are other such courts operated by cities within the county.

Each teen attorney makes an opening statement, the defendant testifies and is cross-examined.

Establishing a teen court program essay

The study failed to find differences in self-feelings. Words: , Paragraphs: 8, Pages: 3 Publication date: February 20, Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! The jury imposed punishment. School officials will also be less burdened by these minor offenses, and in general the community benefits because the minors being tried in these juvenile courts are handled accordingly and receives no exposure to real criminals. Advertisement George was one case on a recent docket of Los Angeles Teen Court, a decade-old experiment in juvenile justice in which willing teenagers submit themselves to a verdict of their peers. After the seminar, a selection will be done as to who shall be jurors, court clerks and bailiffs. The comparison group included youth processed in the same jurisdiction during the same time frame, matched based on offense, gender, age, race and zip code. Both identified comparison cases by randomly selecting youth matched on gender, race, age, and offense. This court shall handle minor offenses, usually those which are done inside the school premises. Of the 15 studies that assessed statistical significance of recidivism, 4 found statistically significant results favoring Teen Courts, 1 found statistically significant results favoring processing in the traditional juvenile justice system, and 10 found null results.

An essay on goals. The four statistically significant studies favoring Teen Courts were all quasi-experimental. Advertisement George was one case on a recent docket of Los Angeles Teen Court, a decade-old experiment in juvenile justice in which willing teenagers submit themselves to a verdict of their peers.

The juvenile court program will proceed on offenses that are considered minor to be taken to the non-juvenile courts. This limitation was acknowledged by a few authors, including Stickle et al. The teen accepts responsibility for their offense, appears before a judge and their peers, and is sentenced.

Fourth, this review was limited to the examination of the impact of Teen Courts on juvenile offender outcomes. The program is beneficial at that it allows offenders to be tried according to a due process instead of being confined with the judgments of the local school board made up of adults ; the peers of offenders will be able to testify and give their sides, and learn lessons as well.

youth court evaluation
Rated 10/10 based on 116 review
Download
Establishing a Teen Court Program Essay Example